{"id":2888,"date":"2025-08-25T17:30:00","date_gmt":"2025-08-25T17:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/?p=2888"},"modified":"2025-08-27T15:50:43","modified_gmt":"2025-08-27T15:50:43","slug":"4-types-of-emails-that-get-the-most-engagement-4-emails-that-fail","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/2025\/08\/25\/4-types-of-emails-that-get-the-most-engagement-4-emails-that-fail\/","title":{"rendered":"4 types of emails that get the most engagement [+ 4 emails that fail]"},"content":{"rendered":"
My inbox is like a box of chocolates: You never know what you\u2019re gonna get (with apologies to Forrest Gump).<\/p>\n
Just today I received:<\/p>\n
I\u2019ll bet your inbox is like a box of chocolates too \u2014\u00a0because pretty much everyone\u2019s is. And that includes your email subscribers.<\/p>\n How can you make sure your emails are ones they engage with? Let\u2019s discuss.<\/p>\n Table of Contents<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/a> <\/p>\n \n <\/a> <\/p>\n There are many types of marketing emails<\/a>, but these are the four with the highest engagement.<\/p>\n There\u2019s a moment right after someone signs up for your list where they\u2019re still curious. Still paying attention. Still wondering if they made the right decision.<\/p>\n That moment? It\u2019s the honeymoon period.<\/p>\n And a well-timed, well-crafted welcome email (or even better, a short welcome series) doesn\u2019t just capitalize on that moment \u2013 it can become the highest-performing message in your entire program.<\/p>\n Case in point: I worked with a B2C client that sells professional training courses. Their welcome email didn\u2019t just beat the performance of their regular sends, it crushed<\/em> it.<\/p>\n You can get the details on the case study here<\/a>.<\/p>\n Yes, the revenue-generated-per-thousand-emails-sent (RPME) for the welcome message was three times that of the company\u2019s average manual send. And the conversion rate? More than five times their manual send average.<\/p>\n And this wasn\u2019t some fluke or one-time promo. It was their automated welcome email. The quiet overachiever that runs in the background and never takes a day off.<\/p>\n So why does it work so well?<\/p>\n Because the welcome email hits when attention, intent, and goodwill are at their peak<\/strong>. Your new subscriber is expecting to hear from you. They want to know what they just signed up for. They\u2019re open to your message \u2026 maybe more than they\u2019ll ever be again.<\/p>\n A strong welcome email:<\/p>\n Think of it this way: If someone shows up on your metaphorical porch and rings the bell, a welcome email is you opening the door and saying, \u201cHey, glad you\u2019re here. Let me show you around.\u201d<\/p>\n It\u2019s not just polite. It\u2019s powerful.<\/p>\n Welcome emails aren\u2019t optional. They\u2019re foundational. If you\u2019re not optimizing this part of your program, you\u2019re leaving easy revenue and long-term relationship equity on the table.<\/strong><\/p>\n If welcome emails are the honeymoon, triggered emails are the \u201cYou left your keys on the counter\u201d<\/em> text that brings someone back before the door fully closes.<\/p>\n These automated sends \u2013 things like cart abandonment and browse abandonment emails \u2013 aren\u2019t just polite reminders. They\u2019re workhorses. Silent performers. Always-on revenue generators.<\/p>\n And they work because<\/em> they\u2019re behavior-based. You\u2019re not guessing what the subscriber might be interested in \u2014 you know<\/em>. They told you with their actions.<\/p>\n Take abandoned cart emails. I worked with a DTC ecommerce brand where the abandonment message was outperforming the client\u2019s regular promotional emails by a wide margin. Open rates were 50%+ above average. Click-throughs? More than double. Conversion rate? More than 2.0%. Revenue-per-email-sent? Through the roof (like \u201c$18 in revenue for every email sent\u201d through the roof) \u2013 see below.<\/p>\n Why? Because timing and relevance are baked in.<\/p>\n These types of triggered emails, especially when they\u2019re thoughtfully written, designed with intent, and sent promptly, routinely outperform the rest of the program.<\/p>\n They feel personal. They\u2019re timely. And they\u2019re directly tied to the recipient\u2019s behavior, which makes them incredibly effective.<\/p>\n So if you\u2019re not yet leaning into triggered sends as part of your email strategy? That\u2019s a gap worth closing.<\/p>\n Want more information on this case study? You\u2019ll find it here<\/a>.<\/p>\n These are my favorite emails. They are the ones that show up with something delightful, informative, or just plain entertaining \u2013 and don\u2019t<\/em> immediately try to sell you something.<\/p>\n I call them value-first emails<\/strong>, and they\u2019re a cornerstone of any long-term nurture strategy.<\/p>\n Instead of pushing a product, you\u2019re offering a moment. A recipe. A puppy video. A quirky holiday tie-in that sparks curiosity or gives your reader a reason to smile.<\/p>\n And that\u2019s the key: They open because they want<\/em> to. Not because they\u2019re ready to buy, but because you\u2019ve trained them to expect something worthwhile, even when there\u2019s no CTA to download or demo or schedule a call.<\/p>\n These emails are especially useful when:<\/p>\n I\u2019ve used value-first emails to help clients reverse engagement slumps, reduce unsubscribes, and keep their brand welcome in the inbox for months (sometimes years) between major campaigns.<\/p>\n The best ones offer something of standalone value \u2013 like a fun fact, a tool, or a video \u2013 while weaving in just enough brand presence to keep you top of mind.<\/p>\n No hard sell. No desperation. Just a quiet reminder that we\u2019re still here, and still useful.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s a B2C example; this was for a well-known university\u2019s MBA program:<\/p>\n And here\u2019s another, for a B2B Financial Services organization:<\/p>\n Want to learn more? Check out this blog post<\/a>.<\/p>\n Email is a visual medium. Even the ones that feel<\/em> like plain text.<\/p>\n So it makes sense that how your email looks \u2013 how it\u2019s structured, how easy it is to scan, how well the design supports the content \u2013 can have a significant impact on engagement.<\/p>\n And yet, too often, design decisions are made based on internal opinions or brand aesthetics alone. Not on what actually drives performance.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s what I\u2019ve learned in 20+ years of optimizing email campaigns: The emails that get the most clicks and the highest engagement overall are the ones that adhere to design best practices.<\/strong><\/p>\n Not overdesigned. Not fancy for the sake of being fancy. Just clean, clear layouts that make it easy for the reader to absorb your message and act on it.<\/p>\n A few key best practices that consistently drive results:<\/p>\n If you’re not sure how your current designs stack up, I broke down some more real-life examples in this article<\/a>. You\u2019ll see before-and-after examples that highlight how just a few simple design tweaks can turn an underperforming email into one that delivers.<\/p>\n Because at the end of the day, good email design doesn\u2019t just look<\/em> good, it performs.<\/p>\n <\/a> <\/p>\n In this section, I\u2019ll discuss the four types of emails with the lowest engagement rates.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s clear something up.<\/p>\n Yes, three of the four emails in our \u201chighest engagement\u201d category were automated<\/a>. But that doesn\u2019t mean any<\/em> automated email is automatically effective.<\/p>\n Automation doesn\u2019t guarantee relevance. It just guarantees that the email will be sent.<\/strong><\/p>\n The most successful automated emails, like welcome messages<\/a>, abandoned cart reminders<\/a>, and triggered follow-ups, are all responses to something the recipient<\/em> did. Someone signs up for your list. Adds an item to their cart. Requests a download or fills out a form.<\/p>\n There\u2019s intent. There\u2019s context. There\u2019s a clear next step.<\/p>\n But when automation is used without regard for relevance<\/em>? That\u2019s when things fall apart.<\/p>\n Maybe it\u2019s a birthday message sent to someone who never gave you their birthdate. A win-back email to someone who just made a purchase last week. A \u201cWe miss you!\u201d nudge to a subscriber who never actually engaged with your emails in the first place.<\/p>\n Not only do these emails not perform, they can actively damage the relationship. Best case, they\u2019re ignored. Worst case, they drive unsubscribes or spam complaints.<\/p>\n The lesson here is simple: Automation is a tool. Relevance is the strategy.<\/p>\n If your automated email doesn\u2019t match where the subscriber is in that<\/em> moment<\/em> \u2013 what they\u2019re thinking, doing, or expecting \u2013 it won\u2019t engage. It won\u2019t convert. And it won\u2019t build trust.<\/p>\n Automation should feel personal. Contextual. Useful.<\/p>\n If it doesn\u2019t, it\u2019s just noise.<\/p>\n Let\u2019s talk about the \u201cpromote, promote, promote\u201d approach to email.<\/p>\n Yes, email can (and should) drive sales. It\u2019s a high-ROI channel. It moves the needle. I\u2019m not here to deny that.<\/p>\n But if every email you send is just a coupon, discount, or \u201clast chance!\u201d promo … you\u2018re training your list to ignore you until you\u2019re giving something away. And that\u2019s a tough habit to break.<\/p>\n Email isn\u2019t just a transactional tool. It\u2019s a relationship channel.<\/p>\n Think long-term. You\u2019re not just looking for a one-time purchase \u2014 you\u2019re building familiarity, trust, and relevance. That means mixing in value: useful tips, insider info, even a little brand personality. The kind of content that makes your readers glad they opened your message even if they don\u2019t click (this time).<\/p>\n The truth is, consistently helpful content earns attention. And attention is the gateway to action.<\/p>\n So yes, promote. But don\u2019t make every email a pitch. Otherwise, the only engagement you’ll get is unsubscribes.<\/p>\n When someone signs up to receive email from you, it\u2019s the start of a relationship. And deception has no place in a healthy relationship. For instance:<\/p>\n You might get an increase in your open and\/or click-through rates the first time you do this, but it\u2019s unlikely they\u2019ll take the action you actually want them to take once they realize they\u2019ve been deceived.<\/p>\n And it\u2019s unlikely they\u2019ll open future emails from you, ending the relationship.<\/p>\n If your email recipients are in the United States, an opt-in is not required under CAN-SPAM. Regardless, you should ALWAYS get an explicit opt-in before sending email to someone.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s why.<\/p>\n Being a consultant based in the United States, I\u2019ve worked with organizations whose lists are opt-in, not-opt-in, and a mix. Here are the data points to consider.<\/p>\n Opt-in lists just perform better. Period. Here\u2019s a client case study, one of a few that I\u2019ve done over the years, that proves it.<\/p>\n Yes, both lists got the exact same email. Yes, we sent the emails at the same time.<\/p>\n The only difference was how the email addresses were acquired. The subscribers on the opt-in list had explicitly asked to receive email from this not-for-profit. The email addresses on the not-opt-in lists had been acquired without the knowledge of those on the list.<\/p>\n Read the full case study<\/a>.<\/p>\n If the person receiving your email doesn\u2019t know how you got their email address, you\u2019re putting yourself at an increased risk of spam complaints and deliverability issues<\/a>.<\/p>\n The non-profit featured in the case study above was cut off by their email service provider. They were no longer allowed to send, because the spam complaints they were receiving on their sends were too high. They were so high that the IP they were on, which they shared with some of the ESP\u2019s other clients, was at risk of being blocklisted.<\/p>\n How high is too high? Here are the thresholds as defined by Google\u2019s Email Sender Guidelines<\/a>:<\/p>\n Years ago I consulted for a publisher. Their entire list was not-opt-in; in addition to scraping names off of the internet (which is an aggravated violation under the U.S. CAN-SPAM Act) they had a company-wide mandate that every employee provide them 25 new email addresses a month.<\/p>\n When I got there they were looking to incorporate best practices<\/a> to improve performance. They were also having serious deliverability problems. There was no way I could help them with the former without fixing the latter.<\/p>\n They were sending from their own servers and they had their own internal deliverability team, because the reputable marketing platforms and deliverability vendors wouldn\u2019t work with organizations whose lists were generating this level of spam complaints.<\/p>\n It was a bad situation. The one thing that would fix it, not overnight but eventually, was going opt-in. But that was a non-negotiable for them. They felt like the risk, and the cost of addressing the consequences of taking the risk, was worth it. I didn\u2019t agree. I didn\u2019t work with them much longer, but we parted amicably.<\/p>\n <\/a> <\/p>\n When email marketing was in its infancy, people would ask me whether they should send promotional messages or newsletters. I would say \u201cyes,\u201d because, like a box of chocolates, variety is also a good thing in email marketing.<\/p>\n The key to success is getting the right mix for your brand \u2013 and for each of your recipients.<\/strong><\/p>\n Here are the non-negotiables:<\/p>\n Does that seem like a lot? Don\u2019t be overwhelmed. Great email marketing programs aren\u2019t built overnight. Start with one email. Then another. Then another. And before you know it you\u2019ll be an email marketing expert.<\/p>\n Editor’s note: This post was originally published in November 2023\u00a0and has been updated for comprehensiveness.<\/span><\/p>\n My inbox is like a box of chocolates: You never know what you\u2019re gonna get (with apologies to Forrest Gump). Just today I received: A newsletter from Monumental Sports Network celebrating the career of Nicklas Backstrom, a beloved player from the Washington Capitals who just departed the NHL. I\u2019m a fan. I engaged; I clicked […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2890,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2888"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2888\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2899,"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2888\/revisions\/2899"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2890"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.coclea.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}<\/a><\/p>\n
\n
4 Types of Emails With the Highest <\/strong>Engagement<\/strong><\/h2>\n
1. Welcome Emails<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
2. Automated Emails Triggered by a Recipient\u2019s Action<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/p>\n
3. Emails That Offer Value to Readers Without a Purchase<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
4. Emails that Adhere to Design Best Practices<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
4 Types of Emails With the Lowest <\/strong>Engagement<\/strong><\/h2>\n
1. Irrelevant Automated Emails<\/strong><\/h3>\n
2. Emails That Are Over-the-Top Promotional<\/strong><\/h3>\n
3. Deceptive Emails<\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
4. Emails That Recipients Haven\u2019t Explicitly Opted In to Receive<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/p>\n
Bottom-Line Performance<\/h4>\n
<\/p>\n
Spam Complaints<\/h4>\n
<\/p>\n
Finding the Right Types of Emails for Your Marketing Strategy<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
Getting Started<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"